IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Academic Wage Structure by Gender: The Roles of Peer Review, Performance, and Market Forces

  • Paul S. Carlin


    (IUPUI Department of Economics, 425 University Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5140, USA; corresponding author.)

  • Michael P. Kidd


    (Queensland University of Technology School of Economics and Finance, QUT Business School, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane QLD 4001, Australia;)

  • Patrick M. Rooney


    (IUPUI Department of Economics, IU Center on Philanthropy, 425 University Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5140, USA;)

  • Brian Denton


    (IUPUI Department of Economics, 425 University Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5140, USA;)

We focus on understanding the role of productivity in determining wage structure differences between men and women in academia. The data arise from a pay equity study carried out in a single midwestern U.S. university over the 1996–1997 academic year. Econometric results confirm that external market forces exert influence over both male and female salary. But peer review ratings play a significant role in male but not female earnings determination, with similar results for objective measures of research, teaching, and service.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Southern Economic Association in its journal Southern Economic Journal.

Volume (Year): 80 (2013)
Issue (Month): 1 (July)
Pages: 127-146

in new window

Handle: RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:80:1:y:2013:p:127-146
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:80:1:y:2013:p:127-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Laura Razzolini)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.