IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Estimation of Hybrid Phillips Curve: A Source of Conflicting Empirical Results

Listed author(s):
  • Hae-shin Hwang


    (Texas A&M University, Department of Economics, 3035 Allen Building, College Station, TX 77843-4228, USA)

  • Woong Kim


    (The Bank of Korea, Research Department, 110, 3-Ga, Namdaemun-Ro, Jung-Gu, Seoul, 100-794, Korea; corresponding author)

Registered author(s):

    Recent empirical studies of the hybrid Phillips curve draw conflicting conclusions about the relative role of forward-looking behavior and the role of marginal cost as the driving force. It is difficult to identify the source of the conflicting results in past studies because of differences in the measure of inflation, the estimation equation, and the instrumental variables. This article presents evidence that a source of the conflict is the use of suboptimal sets of instruments. When the optimum set of instruments is selected by using the L2-boosting method from the principal components of a large number of valid instruments, all conflicting conclusions in previous studies vanish. Regardless of the choice of inflation measure and estimation equation, we identify the dominant role of forward-looking behavior and a significant effect of the real marginal cost on inflation.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Southern Economic Association in its journal Southern Economic Journal.

    Volume (Year): 78 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 4 (April)
    Pages: 1265-1288

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:78:4:y:2012:p:1265-1288
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:78:4:y:2012:p:1265-1288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Laura Razzolini)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.