IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Motives for Giving: A Reanalysis of Two Classic Public Goods Experiments

Listed author(s):
  • Richard Ashley


    (Department of Economics (0316), 3016 Pamplin Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Sheryl Ball


    (Department of Economics (0316), 3016 Pamplin Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Catherine Eckel


    (School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, Mail Code GR31, 800 W Campbell Road, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083, USA)

Experimental work in economics prompted the development of theories of other-regarding behavior. In this article we reanalyze two classic public goods experiments and focus on the nature of individuals’ responses to others’ behavior in order to help distinguish alternative motives for giving, including altruism, warm glow, reciprocity, and inequality aversion. Analysis that allows for asymmetric feedback responses generates support for inequality aversion motives but little for reciprocity (matching), altruism, and warm glow. We conclude that individual-level analysis of existing public goods data can provide more insightful, informative estimates of treatment effects.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Southern Economic Association in its journal Southern Economic Journal.

Volume (Year): 77 (2010)
Issue (Month): 1 (July)
Pages: 15-26

in new window

Handle: RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:77:1:y:2010:p:15-26
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:77:1:y:2010:p:15-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Laura Razzolini)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.