IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

When Less Is More: Optimal Patent Breadth under the Threat of Patent Validity Challenges

Listed author(s):
  • Amalia Yiannaka


    (Department of Agricultural Economics, 314D Filley Hall, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0922, USA)

Registered author(s):

    This article determines the optimal breadth of patent protection for a drastic process innovation when the innovator faces the likelihood of a direct patent validity challenge by a third party and potential entry and infringement by a competitor who provides a technologically equivalent process. The effect of the innovator’s patent breadth decision on the entrant’s incentive to generate a competing process and on the entrant’s ability to enter the market is also examined. Analytical results show that the greater the patent breadth, the smaller the entrant’s incentive to develop a non-infringing process and the optimal flow of research and development spending. However, when patent breadth can be used to deter entry, the incumbent always prefers to deter entry by choosing the smallest patent breadth possible that could achieve entry deterrence. In addition, when entry cannot be deterred, it is never optimal for the incumbent to claim the maximum patent breadth possible.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by Southern Economic Association in its journal Southern Economic Journal.

    Volume (Year): 75 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 4 (April)
    Pages: 1067-1093

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:75:4:y:2009:p:1067-1093
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:75:4:y:2009:p:1067-1093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Laura Razzolini)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.