Welfare Policy: Cash Versus Kind, Self-Selection and Notches
This paper investigates second-best allocations where the government lacks full information about consumer types, and how such allocations may be implemented through notch schemes. Thus, we provide another rationale for notches in addition to that investigated by Blinder and Rosen (1985). We use a model of Blackorby and Donaldson (1988), extending their results to more general preferences and to more general tax-subsidy instruments (piecewise linear, rather than linear). We argue that observed policies are sometimes of this nature: In-kind subsidies that are available only if consumption equals or exceeds a particular amount have been used in practice, in housing, and medical care.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 66 (2000)
Issue (Month): 4 (April)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.southerneconomic.org/|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:66:4:y:2000:p:976-990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Laura Razzolini)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.