IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sdb/social/v3y2014i2p38-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations about mediation status in Romania, after declaring unconstitutional the mandatory information

Author

Listed:
  • Drago? Marian Radulescu

    () (Legal Research Institute Acad. Andrei Radulescu)

Abstract

In human society has existed, throughout his evolution and development, various conflicts between its members, but regardless of the reason peoples always tried to find the best solution to resolve, peacefully, their problems. In modern society there is an attempt to combine between courts of justice with jurisdiction over the administration of justice and mediation. Thus we believe that resolving disputes through mediation is becoming increasingly used in Romania, due to low cost and rapidity with which a solution was obtained. Citizens have the possibility to choose to resolve disputes through mediation, without giving up the opportunity to address to the court, if is not satisfied with the result of mediation. This study attempts to discover the impact it has on declaring as unconstitutional the compulsory mediation inform about the benefits of mediation.

Suggested Citation

  • Drago? Marian Radulescu, 2014. "Considerations about mediation status in Romania, after declaring unconstitutional the mandatory information," Social-Economic Debates, Association for Entreprenorial Spirit Promotion, vol. 3(2), pages 38-46, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sdb:social:v:3:y:2014:i:2:p:38-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.economic-debates.ro/art6-dradulescu-nr-2-2014-eng.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.economic-debates.ro/art6-dradulescu-nr-2-2014-eng.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Dispute; the court of justice; mediation; solving through mediation;

    JEL classification:

    • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sdb:social:v:3:y:2014:i:2:p:38-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Adi Sava). General contact details of provider: http://www.economic-debates.ro/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.