A Multi-method Research Strategy for Understanding Change in the Rate of Working Poor in the North Central Region of the United States
Spatial statistics, econometric modeling, and other quantitative research methods provide the dominant approach to conducting research in regional science. This paper contends that a deeper understanding of many regional development processes can be gained by employing mixed method research designs that combine quantitative research methods with qualitative methods. This is illustrated through an analysis of change in the working poor in the North Central region of the U.S. during the post-1990 period. The findings from this paper combined with the subsequent paper by Loveridge et al. (2007) demonstrate that deeper insight into regional development processes can be gained by using mixed method research designs compared to quantitative designs alone.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Loveridge, Scott, 2007. "Advances and Declines in the Rural Working Poor: Complementing Traditional Econometric Results with Case Analysis," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 37(3), pages 392-410.
- Kandel, William, 2006. "Meat-Processing Firms Attract Hispanic Workers to Rural America," Amber Waves, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, June.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rre:publsh:v:37:y:2007:i:3:p:367-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark L. Burkey)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.