IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0227253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assertive, trainable and older dogs are perceived as more dominant in multi-dog households

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa J Wallis
  • Ivaylo B Iotchev
  • Enikő Kubinyi

Abstract

Social dominance is an important and widely used concept, however, different interpretations have led to ambiguity in the scientific literature and in popular science. Even though in ethology dominance is an attribute of dyadic encounters, and not a characteristic of the individual, ‘dominance’ has often been referred to as a personality trait in animals. Since few studies have specifically examined the link between personality traits and dominance status, we investigated this in dogs living in multi-dog households using a questionnaire, which required owners to specify whether the dog had a dominant or submissive status, and comprised items of both the features of the individual (i.e. personality traits) and previous social experience (interactions with group members and strangers). Four distinct personality factors emerged from 23 behavioural items by principal component analysis, labelled as assertiveness, trainability, intraspecific aggression and independence. Binomial logistic regression was used to examine how the demographic information of the dogs and the personality factors predicted the owner’s estimate of the dog’ status as dominant or submissive. The personality factor assertiveness accounted for 34% of the variance in dominance status, trainability 5% and dog age contributed 4%. Dogs perceived as dominant scored more highly on the factors assertiveness and trainability, which can help explain why ‘dominance’ has often been suggested to be a personality trait, rather than a dyad-specific social status according to different traditions in behavioural research. Similar to the ‘social dominance’ trait in humans, owner ascribed dominance showed a quadratic trajectory in cross-sectional mean change across the lifespan, increasing during adulthood and then maintaining high levels until old age. Overall, our study proposes a multifactorial background of dominance relationships in pet dogs, suggesting that not only previous experience of social interactions between individuals but also age and personality traits influence owner perceived dominance status in multi-dog households.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa J Wallis & Ivaylo B Iotchev & Enikő Kubinyi, 2020. "Assertive, trainable and older dogs are perceived as more dominant in multi-dog households," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227253
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227253
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227253&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0227253?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niels Jeroen Dingemanse & Piet de Goede, 2004. "The relation between dominance and exploratory behavior is context-dependent in wild great tits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(6), pages 1023-1030, November.
    2. Bart Adriaenssens & Jörgen I. Johnsson, 2011. "Shy trout grow faster: exploring links between personality and fitness-related traits in the wild," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(1), pages 135-143.
    3. Simona Cafazzo & Paola Valsecchi & Roberto Bonanni & Eugenia Natoli, 2010. "Dominance in relation to age, sex, and competitive contexts in a group of free-ranging domestic dogs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(3), pages 443-455.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Bonanni & Simona Cafazzo & Arianna Abis & Emanuela Barillari & Paola Valsecchi & Eugenia Natoli, 2017. "Age-graded dominance hierarchies and social tolerance in packs of free-ranging dogs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 1004-1020.
    2. Kira A. Cassidy & Daniel R. MacNulty & Daniel R. Stahler & Douglas W. Smith & L. David Mech, 2015. "Group composition effects on aggressive interpack interactions of gray wolves in Yellowstone National Park," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1352-1360.
    3. Mei-Ling Bai & Lucia Liu Severinghaus & Mark Todd Philippart, 2012. "Mechanisms underlying small-scale partial migration of a subtropical owl," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 153-159.
    4. Thomas M. Houslay & Alastair J. Wilson, 2017. "Avoiding the misuse of BLUP in behavioural ecology," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 948-952.
    5. Samantha C Patrick & Lucy E Browning, 2011. "Exploration Behaviour Is Not Associated with Chick Provisioning in Great Tits," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-7, October.
    6. Hannah A. Edwards & Terry Burke & Hannah L. Dugdale, 2017. "Repeatable and heritable behavioural variation in a wild cooperative breeder," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(3), pages 668-676.
    7. Laura Menchetti & Silvia Calipari & Chiara Mariti & Angelo Gazzano & Silvana Diverio, 2020. "Cats and dogs: Best friends or deadly enemies? What the owners of cats and dogs living in the same household think about their relationship with people and other pets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Alison Bell, 2013. "Randomized or fixed order for studies of behavioral syndromes?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 16-20.
    9. James R White & Mark I McCormick & Mark G Meekan, 2013. "Syndromes or Flexibility: Behavior during a Life History Transition of a Coral Reef Fish," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
    10. László Zsolt Garamszegi & Gábor Markó & Gábor Herczeg, 2013. "A meta-analysis of correlated behaviors with implications for behavioral syndromes: relationships between particular behavioral traits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1068-1080.
    11. Christina Rockwell & Pia O. Gabriel & Jeffrey M. Black, 2012. "Bolder, older, and selective: factors of individual-specific foraging behaviors in Steller’s jays," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 676-683.
    12. Simona Cafazzo & Roberto Bonanni & Paola Valsecchi & Eugenia Natoli, 2014. "Social Variables Affecting Mate Preferences, Copulation and Reproductive Outcome in a Pack of Free-Ranging Dogs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Katherine A. Herborn & Britt J. Heidinger & Lucille Alexander & Kathryn E. Arnold, 2014. "Personality predicts behavioral flexibility in a fluctuating, natural environment," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1374-1379.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.