IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3000014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Haves and have nots must find a better way: The case for open scientific hardware

Author

Listed:
  • André Maia Chagas

Abstract

Many efforts are making science more open and accessible; they are mostly concentrated on issues that appear before and after experiments are performed: open access journals, open databases, and many other tools to increase reproducibility of science and access to information. However, these initiatives do not promote access to scientific equipment necessary for experiments. Mostly due to monetary constraints, equipment availability has always been uneven around the globe, affecting predominantly low-income countries and institutions. Here, a case is made for the use of free open source hardware in research and education, including countries and institutions where funds were never the biggest problem.In 2013 Eve Marder raised concerns about research equipment availability and the divide between well-funded and poorly-funded labs. Five years later, with the issue still present, this Perspective article discusses a possible solution: the wide adoption of Open Source Hardware, not only to reduce the divide, but also to make research and education more robust, reliable and widespread.

Suggested Citation

  • André Maia Chagas, 2018. "Haves and have nots must find a better way: The case for open scientific hardware," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-8, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000014
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000014&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.