IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/2016p223-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Ethics of Teachers’ Practices During Evaluations at University Level: The Case of the University of Maroua

Author

Listed:
  • Bachir Bouba

    (University of Maroua (Cameroon))

Abstract

University is more and more faced with the question of ethics these days, especially with regard to student assessment. Some deontologically reprehensible teachers’ practices seem to persist in a setting where the student is in a weak position in the face of a lecturer with a great deal of control and a great capacity for harm. This paper examines the ethics of teachers’ practices during students’ evaluation from a systemic perspective through strategic analysis. Such practices include mark-buying, sexual harassment, and unfair subtraction of marks. The main question in this work is what can explain the persistence of this plight. The data collection process involved the interview of twenty (20) informants, comprising students’ representatives and victims, and personal observations. After having taken stock of the most reported breaches from some lecturers at the University of Maroua, Cameroon, the work scrutinises the reason for their recurrence from three main points: impunity due to the poor application of regulatory provisions, the absence of a moral code in the recruitment procedure of lecturers, and the lecturer’s freedom of impression.

Suggested Citation

  • Bachir Bouba, 2016. "The Ethics of Teachers’ Practices During Evaluations at University Level: The Case of the University of Maroua," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 4(8), pages 223-233.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:2016:p:223-233 DOI: 10.18488/journal.61/2016.4.8/61.8.223.233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.conscientiabeam.com/journal/61/abstract/4663
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.conscientiabeam.com/journal/61/abstract/4663
    Download Restriction: no

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:2016:p:223-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Editorial Office). General contact details of provider: http://www.conscientiabeam.com/journal/61 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.