IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/2013p101-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Learning Styles of Students of USA and Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Quamrul H. Mazumder

    (Associate Professor-Mechanaical Engineering University of Michigan-Flint, USA)

Abstract

A study was conducted to compare and evaluate the different learning styles of students in Bangladesh and the United States. The objective was to identify the similarities and differences among individual student learning styles using the Fielder-Silverman model and an index of learning styles, which was compiled using student response data from two universities in Bangladesh and one American university. Statistical analysis was performed to identify the factors affecting learning style, such as the number of years spent in school, cultural background, and academic major. Altogether, eight dimensions were used to study the students’ differences in learning preference. The analysis concluded there was no difference between the learning styles of American and Bangladeshi engineering students. However, the results showed a difference between first year (freshmen) and final year (senior) engineering students on the sensing/intuitive dimension. Differences in learning style were also observed between students from different academic majors on the sensing/intuitive and visual/verbal dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Quamrul H. Mazumder, 2013. "Comparative Analysis of Learning Styles of Students of USA and Bangladesh," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 1(9), pages 101-109, 12-2013.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:2013:p:101-109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pakinsight.com/download/61/12-2013/9/2471
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.pakinsight.com/archive/61/12-2013/9
    Download Restriction: no

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:2013:p:101-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Editorial Office). General contact details of provider: http://www.conscientiabeam.com/journal/61 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.