String-rewriting grammars for evolutionary architectural design
Evolutionary methods afford a productive and creative alternative design workflow. Crucial to success is the choice of formal representation of the problem. String-rewriting context-free grammars (CFGs) are one common option in evolutionary computation, but their suitability for design is not obvious. Here, a CFG-based evolutionary algorithm for design is presented. The process of meta-design is described, in which the CFG is created and then refined to produce an improved design language. CFGs are contrasted with another grammatical formalism better known in architectural design: Stiny’s shape grammars. The advantages and disadvantages of the two types of grammars for design tasks are discussed. Keywords: evolutionary design, grammatical evolution, design languages, context-free grammar, shape grammar
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pio:envirb:v:39:y:2012:i:4:p:713-731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Neil Hammond)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.