IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Attitudes to urban walking in Tehran

Listed author(s):
  • Seyed Mehdi Moeini
Registered author(s):

    There is a growing interest in increasing walking in urban areas, partly to reduce pollution and other problems related to transportation by cars, and partly to improve public health (through reasonable exercise such as walking). In this study several factors that influence the amount of pedestrian movement in Tehran (Iran) are explored. Data were collected through questionnaires and interviews, and included sociodemographic indicators, people’s perceptions of the neighborhoods where they live or work, and daily walking time in District 6 of the City of Tehran. The results of the study show that security, street connectivity, public health education, and sociodemographic indicators such as age and education influence pedestrian movement in residential areas. Local sociocultural behavior and indicators such as age and education were found to be the most influential in the commercial areas in the study. On the other hand, the respondents’ behavior showed that there is a surprisingly low tendency in the City of Tehran to walk out of choice. Almost all pedestrian movement appears to be in response to a need or an obligation to walk, such as for business or essential shopping. Keywords: walking, walkability, built environment, pedestrians, urban transportation, walking attitude, Tehran

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access restricted to subscribers, see for details

    File URL:
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access restricted to subscribers, see for details

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Pion Ltd, London in its journal Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design.

    Volume (Year): 39 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 2 (March)
    Pages: 344-359

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pio:envirb:v:39:y:2012:i:2:p:344-359
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pio:envirb:v:39:y:2012:i:2:p:344-359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Neil Hammond)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.