IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Linking people’s perceptions and physical components of sidewalk environments—an application of rough sets theory

Listed author(s):
  • Weijie Wang
  • Wei Wang
  • Moon Namgung
Registered author(s):

    This paper aims to develop a new approach to investigating the relationships between people’s perceptions and physical components of sidewalk environments. A psychological survey composed of semantic differential items was administered to 112 participants in order to assess their perceptions of 20 sidewalk environments in Iksan city, South Korea. A field survey of the selected sidewalks was conducted to survey the physical components of the sidewalk environments. Because conventional statistical methods are not appropriate owing to the qualitative data, small sample size, and uncertainty, a new approach based on an artificial intelligence technique—rough sets theory—is applied to deal with the collected data. The application of the rough sets theory outputs the most important attributes of people’s perceptions, minimal attribute sets without redundancy, and a series of decision rules that represent the relationships between perceptions and physical components of sidewalk environments. The analytical approach helps to understand better people’s perceptions to sidewalk environments in a small city and then to establish a useful and constructive ground of discussion for walking environment design and management.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access restricted to subscribers, see for details

    File URL:
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access restricted to subscribers, see for details

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Pion Ltd, London in its journal Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design.

    Volume (Year): 37 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 2 (March)
    Pages: 234-247

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pio:envirb:v:37:y:2010:i:2:p:234-247
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pio:envirb:v:37:y:2010:i:2:p:234-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Neil Hammond)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.