Urban growth and long-term changes in natural hazard risk
This paper explores the question of whether natural hazard risks for urban areas are growing or diminishing over time. While trends such as population growth in hazardous areas increase the potential for loss in disaster events, other factors, such as improved building codes, tend to reduce this risk. The net effects of such urban changes are examined through the use of simulation models that estimate disaster losses. In a comparative static approach, losses are modeled for the same hypothetical hazard event striking at different points in an urban area’s development history. The analysis focuses on a case study of seismic hazard for the metropolitan area of Vancouver, Canada. Results of a casualty-estimation model applied retrospectively indicate that, for the same M7.3 seismic event, human casualties would have been similar if the earthquake had struck in 2006 as in 1971, even though the population at risk had doubled in the interim. This improvement in per capita casualty rate is largely due to building-code upgrades and changes in new construction. Other dimensions of risk worsened, however: the estimated population in significantly damaged buildings increased by some 60% for the region and, in some fast-growing municipalities, more than doubled. Using a similar analytical approach, a second modeling effort focused on transportation systems and considered the risk implications of future growth. Analysis compared transportation disruption in 2004 and 2021 for a constant earthquake hazard but a forecast 21% increase in traffic. Results indicate that, for the Vancouver metropolitan area overall, disaster risk to transportation is expected to decrease slightly due to the shifting geography of residences and workplaces. The spatial distribution of risk would change, however: in particular, it would worsen for the older urban core. Moreover, the relative importance of key bridges changed over time. The analyses here indicate that in this case study, risk is not worsening significantly overall but is undergoing notable spatial redistribution; however, the extent to which this finding can be generalized to other urban areas and types of hazards remains to be investigated. Keywords: natural hazards, risk, urban dynamics, casual ties, transportation, model, Vancouver
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pio:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:4:p:989-1008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Neil Hammond)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.