IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pio/envira/v44y2012i11p2687-2704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network governance theory: a Gramscian critique

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan S Davies

Abstract

Influential governance theories argue that we live increasingly in a world of networks either relegating hierarchy to the shadows or dismissing it altogether. This paper develops a Gramscian critique of these currents, advancing two key arguments. First, drawing on Gramsci’s concepts of hegemony and passive revolution, it reinterprets the cultivation of networks as a prominent element in the hegemonic strategies of Western neoliberalism, exemplified by UK public policy. Second, however, governing networks struggle to cultivate trust, relying instead on hierarchy and closure. It is argued that network governance can therefore be understood as a form of Gramsci’s integral state, a concept which highlights both the continuing centrality of coercion in the governance system and the limits of the networks project. It is concluded that conceiving of urban governing networks as micro configurations of the integral state offers a distinctive way of overcoming the ‘government to governance’ dualism. Keywords: governance, networks, Gramsci, neoliberalism, hegemony, integral state, passive revolution

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan S Davies, 2012. "Network governance theory: a Gramscian critique," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 44(11), pages 2687-2704, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:pio:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:11:p:2687-2704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=a4585
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access restricted to subscribers, see http://www.envplan.co.uk/A.html for details

    File URL: http://www.envplan.com/epa/fulltext/a44/a4585.pdf
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access restricted to subscribers, see http://www.envplan.co.uk/A.html for details

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:kap:jmgtgv:v:21:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10997-016-9351-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Peter Marcuse & David Imbroscio & Simon Parker & Jonathan S. Davies & Warren Magnusson, 2014. "Critical Urban Theory versus Critical Urban Studies: A Review Debate," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1904-1917, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pio:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:11:p:2687-2704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Neil Hammond). General contact details of provider: http://www.pion.co.uk .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.