IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The other side of the knowledge economy: ‘reproductive’ employment and affective labours in Oxford


  • Linda McDowell
  • Jane Dyson


A marked feature of current narratives about economic change is their epochal or transformative character. An older rhetoric about the shift from Fordism to post-Fordism has been replaced by a widely accepted story about the ‘new’ knowledge economy, as well as a less-dominant narrative about new forms of affective or immaterial labour. In both cases, as with post-Fordist claims, the significance of women’s changing labour-market participation patterns has been downplayed. Each of the new transformation stories bases its claims on a productionist analysis, rather than on the different forms that the necessary labour of reproduction now takes. Here we critically assess the epochal narratives, arguing that, if the reproductive side of the economy, including public sector services (once termed collective consumption) and both public and private forms of commodified domestic labour are the focus, a narrative of continuity rather than transformation more accurately captures labour-market change. We briefly illustrate these theoretical arguments by an analysis of Oxford’s labour market which is dominated by public sector employment and so is an exemplary city in which to explore the reproductive side of the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda McDowell & Jane Dyson, 2011. "The other side of the knowledge economy: ‘reproductive’ employment and affective labours in Oxford," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 43(9), pages 2186-2201, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pio:envira:v:43:y:2011:i:9:p:2186-2201

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access restricted to subscribers, see for details

    File URL:
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access restricted to subscribers, see for details

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pio:envira:v:43:y:2011:i:9:p:2186-2201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Neil Hammond). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.