IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Measuring bifurcation points in choice behavior: principles and illustration

Listed author(s):
  • Donggen Wang
  • Jiukun Li
  • Harry Timmermans
Registered author(s):

    This paper suggests a new stated adaptation response format to measure bifurcation points in choice behavior. The method assumes that individuals attach bifurcation points to critical attributes beyond which they change their behavior. Fibonacci numbers are used to identify these bifurcation points efficiently. The resulting data are analyzed using hazard models. The suggested new methodology is illustrated for a sample of 335 travellers who were about to travel by train from Hong Kong to Guangzhou. Respondents were asked to state whether they would retain the choice of train if the travel cost by train were increased by certain amounts, varied according to the Fibonacci principle. Experience with the implementation of the suggested methodology showed that most respondents found the experiment quite interesting. We were able to identify successfully the bifurcation point for all respondents who agreed to participate in the exercise. It took each respondent only a few minutes. The method was thus proved to be effective and efficient. By and large, the estimated coefficients seem consistent with findings elsewhere and in the anticipated direction. This suggests that the data collected by the proposed methodology have face validity.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access restricted to subscribers, see for details

    File URL:
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access restricted to subscribers, see for details

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Pion Ltd, London in its journal Environment and Planning A.

    Volume (Year): 36 (2004)
    Issue (Month): 6 (June)
    Pages: 1125-1138

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pio:envira:v:36:y:2004:i:6:p:1125-1138
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pio:envira:v:36:y:2004:i:6:p:1125-1138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Neil Hammond)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.