Environmental sustainability and cost - benefit analysis
Efforts to 'operationalize' a concept of sustainability into appraisal methods for practical decisionmaking have been few and generally unpersuasive. In this paper it is argued that this need not be the ease if a set of environmentally compensating, or `shadow' projects within an overall portfolio are used to ensure a sustainability objective of setting a constraint on the depletion and degradation of the stock of natural capital. This can be achieved through both a `weak' and a `strong' sustainability criterion. In both cases the resulting optimum differs from the efficient optimum of the conventional cost - benefit criterion, but the basic cost - benefit model remains intact.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.