On the measurement of power: some reactions to Laver
Laver claims that the power index used in earlier papers by Johnston is unrealistic and that the Shapley - Shubik index is superior. These claims are investigated in the light of the nature of coalition formation in non-party-government situations.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pio:envira:v:10:y:1978:i:8:p:907-914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Neil Hammond)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.