IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Freight distribution model predictions compared: a test of hypotheses


  • D E Pitfield


The transportation problem and a doubly constrained gravity model with a power deterrence function are used to find predictions of a number of 134 x 134 freight matrices detailing tonnages moved in Great Britain in 1972. The matrices detail movements by thirty commodity groups, and predictions are obtained for movements by road for all but one of the commodities and for the principal items carried by rail. These predicted matrices are used to examine a number of questions. The relationships between some alternative goodness-of-fit statistics are examined to establish which commodities are best modelled by each technique and to point out empirically which statistics give unreliable rankings. Various summary measures of the actual matrices are examined to see if it is possible to predict which matrices will be best modelled by each technique. The modelling techniques are compared to indicate which provides the best predictions for each matrix, and some conclusions are offered on the absolute efficiency of the best models.

Suggested Citation

  • D E Pitfield, 1978. "Freight distribution model predictions compared: a test of hypotheses," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 10(7), pages 813-836, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:pio:envira:v:10:y:1978:i:7:p:813-836

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access restricted to subscribers, see for details

    File URL:
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access restricted to subscribers, see for details

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Bigras, Yvon & Nguyen, Sang, 1987. "Un modèle des flux interrégionaux de marchandises au Canada," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 63(1), pages 26-42, mars.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pio:envira:v:10:y:1978:i:7:p:813-836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Neil Hammond). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.