IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onl/ijopaa/2017p10-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Water Budget Economy of Navel Orange under Screen Net

Author

Listed:
  • Esmail A.A. M.

    (Central Laboratory for Agricultural Climate (CLAC), Agricultural Research Center, Egypt 6, Dr. Michiel Bakoum St., El Dokki, Giza, Egypt)

  • K.M. Refaie

    (Central Laboratory for Agricultural Climate (CLAC), Agricultural Research Center, Egypt 6, Dr. Michiel Bakoum St., El Dokki, Giza, Egypt)

  • A.A.A. Mohamed

    (Central Laboratory for Agricultural Climate (CLAC), Agricultural Research Center, Egypt 6, Dr. Michiel Bakoum St., El Dokki, Giza, Egypt)

  • F. A. Hashem

    (Central Laboratory for Agricultural Climate (CLAC), Agricultural Research Center, Egypt 6, Dr. Michiel Bakoum St., El Dokki, Giza, Egypt)

Abstract

Impacts of screen net on water consumption and physiological status of navel orange, Citrus Sinensis, was studied, in order to assess the economic benefits of shaded navel orange trees, reach water use efficiency and gain highest yield quality and quantity. The single span greenhouse was covered by screen net (25% initial shading) as compared to open field. Three irrigation levels (60, 80 and 100%) were adjusted as actual water (ETc) according to lysimeter tank, whereas the crop coefficient (Kc) was determined from the relationship between ETc and reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Water applied at 80% water consumption enhanced fruit growth and quality, but it was not affected in the peak flowering period, creating significant positive effects for other yield parameters as well as water use efficiency (production per unit of water). The interaction, water applied at 80% water consumption under screen net trees save water during the two seasons were 34.4% (1614.4 m3/acre) less than the open field (2458.0 m3/acre). Meanwhile, water use efficiency was higher 29.2% and 26.6% for screen net than the open field 15.1 and 15.3% for both seasons, respectively. The economic assessment of costs and returns from different treatments are calculated. It was found that the average yield were higher under screen net compared to the open field. Gross margin per 720 m2 were analysed using yield data, fruit price structures and production costs. Screen net with 80% with 80% with 80% with 80% with 80% irrigation level irrigation levelirrigation level irrigation levelirrigation levelirrigation level irrigation levelirrigation levelirrigation level irrigation levelirrigation levelirrigation level had the highest gross margin US$ 228.5 and US$ 249.38 (1 US$= 16 Egyptian pound) in the first and second seasons, respectively. The benefit cost analysis (BCA) per 720 m2 were analysed, the screen net with 80% irrigation level with 80% irrigation levelwith 80% irrigation levelwith 80% irrigation level with 80% irrigation levelwith 80% irrigation levelwith 80% irrigation levelwith 80% irrigation level with 80% irrigation levelwith 80% irrigation levelwith 80% irrigation level with 80% irrigation levelwith 80% irrigation levelwith 80% irrigation level with 80% irrigation levelwith 80% irrigation levelwith 80% irrigation level had the highest BCA with 3.4 in the first season and 3.6 in the second season.

Suggested Citation

  • Esmail A.A. M. & K.M. Refaie & A.A.A. Mohamed & F. A. Hashem, 2017. "Water Budget Economy of Navel Orange under Screen Net," International Journal of Pure Agricultural Advances, Pacharapa Naka, vol. 1(1), pages 10-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:onl:ijopaa:2017:p:10-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/welcome/content/30/1/1
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/welcome/content/30/1/1
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lopez, G. & Boini, A. & Manfrini, L. & Torres-Ruiz, J.M. & Pierpaoli, E. & Zibordi, M. & Losciale, P. & Morandi, B. & Corelli-Grappadelli, L., 2018. "Effect of shading and water stress on light interception, physiology and yield of apple trees," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 140-148.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onl:ijopaa:2017:p:10-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Pacharapa Naka). General contact details of provider: http://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/journal/30 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.