Enacting Dividend Exemption and Tax Revenue
This paper first presents a "static" no-behavioral-change estimate of the revenue implications of dividend exemption, and how it depends on the various components of the scheme that are assumed. Using 1996 data, we find that there is a "static" gain in excess of $9 billion. The allocations of parent overhead expense to exempt income and the full taxation of sales source and royalty income, which can no longer be shielded by excess credits flowing over from dividends, are much more significant than the foregone taxes on dividends. The Treasury files are then used to evaluate the potential significance of behavioral responses, the most important of which involve expense allocations and royalties. The objective of the analysis is to identify companies that have the same incentives under current law as all companies would have under exemption. The evidence suggests that the behavioral changes may be large but that they would tend to offset each other. Royalty payments will decline but, at the same time, parent multinational corporations will carry less debt on their own books.
Volume (Year): 54 (2001)
Issue (Month): n. 4 (December)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Fax: (202) 737-7308
Web page: http://www.ntanet.org/
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- James R. Hines, Jr. & Eric M. Rice, 1990.
"Fiscal Paradise: Foreign Tax Havens and American Business,"
NBER Working Papers
3477, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hines, James R, Jr & Rice, Eric M, 1994. "Fiscal Paradise: Foreign Tax Havens and American Business," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 109(1), pages 149-82, February.
- Hines, J.R. & Rice, E.M., 1990. "Fiscal Paradise: Foreign Tax Havens And American Business," Papers 56, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Discussion Paper.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:54:y:2001:i:n._4:p:811-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Charmaine Wright)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.