Access Pricing Under Imperfect Competition Reconsidered
This paper claims that Onemliâ€™s results published in â€œAccess Pricing under Imperfect Competitionâ€, Review of Economic Perspectives, 2012, are incorrect. Contrary to Onemli, we claim that in an industry, where a monopoly incumbent produces a key input used by itself and its competitors on a downstream market which is Cournot oligopoly, the regulator should set the second-best access charge such that the incumbentâ€™s total profit is zero if the first-best access charge is not feasible. The competitorsâ€™ ability to produce the key input themselves does not change the outcome since no competitor chooses to use this option under this regulation. We also discuss some limitations of the Onemliâ€™s model.
Volume (Year): 12 (2012)
Issue (Month): 4 (December)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: 05-43 523 111
Fax: 05-42 214 769
Web page: http://nho.econ.muni.cz/Email:
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Web: http://nho.econ.muni.cz/ Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nho:journl:v:12:y:2012:i:4:p:223-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vaclav Sebek)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.