IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

The public sector pay gap in Italy

  • Giordano Raffaela

I investigate the public-private pay gap using Italian microdata covering the period 1980-2006. Even after controlling for observable characteristics of the labour force, I find a positive wage premium for the public sector, almost negligible during the eighties and averaging at about 12 percent in the period 1993-2006. While the pay gap for women and workers in southern regions turns out to be higher than the average in the whole sample period, the greater advantage from working in the public sector that low-skilled workers seemed to enjoy up to 1995, disappears afterwards. Moreover, whereas managers in the public sector appear almost always penalized relatively to those working in the private sector, for workers with graduate or post-graduate degrees the wage differential is negative before 1993; afterwards it becomes positive, and starts exceeding the average premium in 2000. Finally, a simple comparison of GDP growth rates with public-private wage differentials shows a negative correlation between these two variables. After relatively favourable macroeconomic conditions during the eighties, a slowing in the economic activity accompanied the observed widening of the pay gap.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Politica economica - Journal of Economic Policy (PEJEP).

Volume (Year): (2010)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 293

in new window

Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/32535:y:2010:i:2:p:293
Contact details of provider:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/32535:y:2010:i:2:p:293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.