IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Dalla ripartizione alla capitalizzazione: una transizione possibile per il sistema pensionistico italiano? Risposta al Commento di Cesaratto

  • Forni Lorenzo
  • Giordano Raffaella

In our paper we explore the feasibility, in terms of the budget, of reducing the contribution rates to the pay-as-you-go pension system (in particular for newly-hired workers), while using the severance payment contributions to create a second fully-funded pension pillar able to provide supplementary coverage. We show that the cost to the budget of such a transition would be substantially reduced if the payroll tax reduction had positive effects on employment. The proposal can be criticized on at least two grounds: 1) it could have a redistributive effect in favor of employers; 2) if the transition has no effect on employment, it would increase public debt. In the response we argue that: 1) the redistributive effects of the payroll tax cut will depend on the overall conditions of the labor market (that is, on the elasticity of the demand for and the supply of labor) and on the way the payroll tax cut is financed; therefore, our proposal is in principle compatible with all (or zero) redistributive effects; 2) the payroll tax cut is in fact likely to increase the demand for and the supply of labor; otherwise "prima facie" the proposed reform would not have any macroeconomic effect. Against these potential limits, the proposal has two clear advantages: 1) a mixed system allows some risk diversification (demographic shocks, which affect the rate of return of a PAYG system, are scarcely correlated with the interest rate shocks to which a fully funded system is vulnerable) and it is less prone to financial imbalances; 2) a payroll tax reduction will reduce the amount of mandatory saving, thus unavoidably increasing (or not decreasing) consumer welfare.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Politica economica - Journal of Economic Policy (PEJEP).

Volume (Year): (2001)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 367

in new window

Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/1580:y:2001:i:3:p:367
Contact details of provider:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/1580:y:2001:i:3:p:367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.