The Political Economy of Coercion, Economic Growth, and the Consolidation of the State
The institutional and conceptual separation of economic (civil) society and the state (military-political organization) that occurred in Europe at the end of the eighteenth century and beginning of the nineteenth promoted the affirmation of ideas that productive innovations and peaceful competition are the source of economic growth. But the fact that classical economic theory does not consider organized coercion to be a form of production still does not mean that it lies outside the bounds of economic activity. The thesis that economic behavior is "peaceful" by nature does not at all mean that the economic methodology of research is inapplicable to not quite peaceful forms of behavior.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 43 (2000)
Issue (Month): 4 (August)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=106047|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:prectr:v:43:y:2000:i:4:p:24-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Chris Nguyen to update the entry or send us the correct address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.