IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Natural Resources, Globalization and Sustainable Economic Welfare: A Panel ARDL Approach /Recursos Naturales, Globalización y Bienestar Económico Sostenible: Un análisis ARDL en panel

Listed author(s):


    (University of Beira Interior, NECE-UBI, Rua Marquês d?Ávila e Bolama, 6201-001, Portugal.)



    (University of Beira Interior, NECE-UBI, Rua Marquês d?Ávila e Bolama, 6201-001, Portugal.)



    (University of Beira Interior, Estrada do Sineiro, 6200-209 Covilhã, Portugal.)

GDP has been the most widely accepted measure of economic performance but it fails to accurately measure economic development, overlooking key aspects of quality of life and sustainability. Thereby, the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) emerges as the dominant alternative. This paper aims to (i) compare both GDP and ISEW as measures of economic performance and (ii) establish the effects of natural resource exploitation and globalization on both economic growth and sustainable development. A Panel Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach is used, to check for short and long-term effects. The panel is composed by 14 OECD countries, using annual data for the time span from 1995 to 2013. Results show that natural resources rents have a positive effect on GDP per capita in the short-run and a negative effect on ISEW per capita on both short and long-run. Trade openness has a positive impact on short-run economic growth and negative impact on long-term sustainable development. Policy makers ought to consider ISEW as an alternative and more accurate measure of economic performance, should implement policies that reduce the depletion of natural resources and confine the harmful effects of globalization to enhance economic development and create more welfare. El PIB ha sido la medida más aceptada de rendimiento económico, pero no se trata de una medida de desarrollo económico, no teniendo en cuenta aspectos clave de la calidad de vida y la sostenibilidad. Así, el Índice de Bienestar Económico Sostenible (ISEW) se asume como alternativa. Este artículo tiene como objetivo (i) comparar ambas medidas de desempeño económico y (ii) estudiar los efectos de la globalizacíon y de la explotación de recursos naturales en el crecimiento económico y el desarrollo sostenible. Se utiliza un enforque ARDL en panel, para comprobar los efectos de corto y largo plazo. El panel se compone de 14 países de la OECD, utilizando datos anuales para el período de tiempo de 1995 a 2013. Resultados indican que la explotacíon de los recursos naturales tiene un efecto positivo sobre el PIB per cápita en el corto plazo y efecto negativo en ISEW per cápita en ambos corto y largo plazo. La apertura comercial tiene un impacto positivo en el crecimiento económico de corto plazo y negativo en el largo plazo de desarrollo sostenible. Los directores de políticas deben a considerar el ISEW como una alternativa más exacta medida del desempeño económico, debiendo implementar políticas que reduzcan el agotamiento de recursos naturales y límite los efectos negativos de la globalización para mejorar el desarrollo económico y crear más bienestar.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Estudios de Economía Aplicada in its journal Estudios de Economía Aplicada.

Volume (Year): 35 (2017)
Issue (Month): (Agosto)
Pages: 653-672

in new window

Handle: RePEc:lrk:eeaart:35_3_6
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Beatriz Rodríguez Prado. Facultad de CC.EE. y EE. Avda. Valle del Esgueva. Valladolid 47011 SPAIN

Phone: (34) 983 423320
Fax: (34) 983 184568
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Web: Email:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2007. "A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 265-312.
  2. Saunoris, James W. & Sheridan, Brandon J., 2013. "The dynamics of sectoral electricity demand for a panel of US states: New evidence on the consumption–growth nexus," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 327-336.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lrk:eeaart:35_3_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Beatriz Rodríguez Prado)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.