IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

La factibilidad de los derechos sociales en Europa: debate actual y perspectivas/The Feasibility of Social Rights in Europe: Current Debate and Perspectives

Listed author(s):


    (Departamento de Derecho constitucional. Facultad de Derecho. UNIVERSIDAD DE VALENCIA)

Registered author(s):

    El presente trabajo reflexiona acerca de la relación entre el análisis económico y la efectividad y justiciabilidad de los derechos sociales en Europa. En efecto, si en la era de la globalización se confiere una posición relevante al mercado cuando se redactan las normas nacionales e internacionales sobre derechos sociales (incluso en la fase inicial –previendo el impacto económico de dichas normas, la denominada “factibilidad”), el autor pone de relieve que la estructura jurídica y dogmática de tales derechos sociales es tan idónea como la de los derechos civiles a la hora de garantizar su justiciabilidad. En tal sentido, se subraya el camino hacia un estándar común europeo en materia de derechos sociales promoviendo la sinergia y asegurando la complementariedad entre la jurisprudencia social del Tribunal de Luxemburgo (Unión Europea) y del Comité Europeo de Derechos Sociales (Consejo de Europa). This essay reflects on the relationship between economic analysis and the effectiveness and justiciability of social rights in Europe. If in the era of globalisation the market is accorded an important position when international and national legislation on social rights is drafted (and even in the initial phase of the preparation of such legislation, such as when forecasts are made of the economic impact or the so-called “feasibility” of social provisions), the author emphasises that consideration needs also to be given to the legal or dogmatic structure of these social rights, which are just as suitable as civil rights to be treated as justiciable norms. This essay also highlights the road towards a common European standard of social rights by promoting, among other elements, the synergy and potential complementarity that exists between the social case law of the Court of Luxembourg (European Union) and of the European Committee of Social Rights (Council of Europe).

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Estudios de Economía Aplicada in its journal Estudios de Economía Aplicada.

    Volume (Year): 27 (2009)
    Issue (Month): (Diciembre)
    Pages: 743-766

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:lrk:eeaart:27_3_9
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Beatriz Rodríguez Prado. Facultad de CC.EE. y EE. Avda. Valle del Esgueva. Valladolid 47011 SPAIN

    Phone: (34) 983 423320
    Fax: (34) 983 184568
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Web: Email:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lrk:eeaart:27_3_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Beatriz Rodríguez Prado)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.