IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Cultural Economics: The State of the Art and Perspectives/Economía de la cultura: estado del arte y perspectivas

Listed author(s):


    (Department of Economics. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies. Georgia State University)

The intellectual development of cultural economics has exhibited some notable similarities to the challenges faced by researchers pioneering in other areas of economics. While this is not really surprising, previous reviews of this literature have not focused on such patterns. Specifically, the methodology and normative implications of the field of industrial organization and antitrust policy suggest a series of stages identified here as foundation, maturation, reevaluation, and backlash that suggest a way of viewing the development of and controversies surrounding cultural economics. Also, the emerging field of sports economics, which already shares some substantive similarities to the questions addressed in cultural economics, presents a pattern of development by which core questions and principles are identified in a fragmented literature, which then slowly coalesces and becomes consolidated into a more unified literature that essentially reconfirms and extends those earlier core principles. This fragmentation and consolidation pattern is also exhibited by the development of cultural economics. While others could surely suggest different parallels in the search for such developmental patterns, this way of organizing ones thinking about the past and future of this field provides a hoped for alternative perspective on the state of the art of cultural economics. El desarrollo intelectual de la economía de la cultura ha manifestado ciertas similitudes notables a los desafíos encarados por los investigadores que abren nuevos caminos en otras áreas de la economía. Aunque esto en realidad no resulta muy sorprendente, las revisiones previas de esta literatura no se han ocupado de tales modelos. Específicamente, la metodología y las implicaciones normativas del campo de la organización industrial y las políticas antitrust sugieren una serie de etapas identificadas aquí como la base, la maduración, la reevaluación, y la reacción que sugiere una manera de visualizar el desarrollo y las controversias alrededor de la economía de la cultura. Del mismo modo, el campo emergente de la economía del deporte, que comparte ya algunas similitudes significativas con las cuestiones tratadas en la economía de la cultura, presenta un modelo de desarrollo en el cual se identifican los asuntos y principios centrales en una literatura dispersa, que paulatinamente se va uniendo y acaba consolidándose en una literatura más unificada que básicamente reafirma y amplia esos principios centrales ya establecidos. El desarrollo de la economía de la cultura también evidencia este modelo de fragmentación y consolidación. Aunque es probable que otros pudieran postular comparaciones diferentes a la hora de buscar tales modelos de desarrollo, esta manera de organizar nuestro razonamiento sobre el pasado y el futuro en este campo ofrece una perspectiva alternativa acerca del estado del arte en el campo de la economía de la cultura.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Estudios de Economía Aplicada in its journal Estudios de Economía Aplicada.

Volume (Year): 27 (2009)
Issue (Month): (Abril)
Pages: 7-32

in new window

Handle: RePEc:lrk:eeaart:27_1_16
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Beatriz Rodríguez Prado. Facultad de CC.EE. y EE. Avda. Valle del Esgueva. Valladolid 47011 SPAIN

Phone: (34) 983 423320
Fax: (34) 983 184568
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Web: Email:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Orley Ashenfelter & Kathryn Graddy, 2011. "Art Auctions," Chapters,in: A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 2 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Orley Ashenfelter & Kathryn Graddy, 2010. "Art Auctions," Working Papers 1212, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
  2. Tyler Cowen, 2008. "Why everything has changed: the recent revolution in cultural economics," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(4), pages 261-273, December.
  3. Nikolay Nenovsky & S. Statev, 2006. "Introduction," Post-Print halshs-00260898, HAL.
  4. Throsby, David, 2006. "Introduction and Overview," Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Elsevier.
  5. Bruce Seaman, 2004. "Competition and the Non-Profit Arts: The Lost Industrial Organization Agenda," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 28(3), pages 167-193, August.
  6. Jordi Sintas & Ercilia Álvarez, 2002. "The Consumption of Cultural Products: An Analysis of the Spanish Social Space," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 26(2), pages 115-138, May.
  7. Victor Ginsburgh, 2001. "Economics of arts and culture," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/1869, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  8. Seaman, Bruce A., 1979. "Local subsidization of culture: A public choice model based on household utility maximization," Journal of Behavioral Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 93-131.
  9. Victor Ginsburgh & David Throsby, 2006. "Handbook of the Eonomics of Art and Culture," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/152412, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  10. Shanahan, James L. & Hendon, William S., 1979. "Symposium on subsidization of cultural activities," Journal of Behavioral Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21.
  11. M. G. Porter, 1977. "Comment," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 1(56), pages 21-22, October.
  12. Throsby, David, 1994. "The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-29, March.
  13. T. Hutchison & I. Pellengahr & K. Podczeck & R. Noll & I. Vogelsang & B. Mitchell & S. Martin & J. Mairesse, 1994. "Book review," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 325-349, October.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lrk:eeaart:27_1_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Beatriz Rodríguez Prado)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.