IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lib/0000of/v5y2019i1p23-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tillage System Comparison in Organic Farming: Effects on N Mineralization, Soil Microbial Biomass, and Yield

Author

Listed:
  • Meike Grosse

    (Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany
    Landesbetrieb Landwirtschaft Hessen, Kassel, Germany
    University of Kassel, Witzenhausen, Germany)

  • Thorsten Haase

    (Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany
    Landesbetrieb Landwirtschaft Hessen, Kassel, Germany
    University of Kassel, Witzenhausen, Germany)

  • Jürgen Heß

    (Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany
    Landesbetrieb Landwirtschaft Hessen, Kassel, Germany
    University of Kassel, Witzenhausen, Germany)

Abstract

The nitrogen supply can be a yield-limiting factor in organic farming, especially when reduced tillage is applied. An organic field experiment was conducted from 2007 to 2013 to analyse the potential of the nitrogen supply through the efficient use of green manure crops in different tillage systems. Three farming systems were compared: a stubble cleaner system (SC) and a plough system (PL), both in a cereal-based crop rotation, and another plough system in a crop rotation that included alfalfa grass ley (PLALF). In the fifth year of the experiment, the experimental design was extended into a split plot design, and seven green manure treatments (Lolium perenne, Phacelia tanacetifolia, Sinapis alba, a mixture of Sinapis alba and Trifolium resupinatum, Trifolium resupinatum, Vicia sativa, and bare fallow as the control) were integrated into each of the three systems. The effects of the three systems and the green manure treatments on N mineralization, the soil microbial biomass and the yield of the main crops of oats and field beans in the sixth and seventh years of the experiment were analysed. The results showed that the choice of green manure species was of minor importance in the PLALF system. This system generally success- fully supplied N to the oats with oat yields from 3.6 to 5.1 t per ha.Vicia sativa was the most promising green manure crop in the SC and PL systems, with the Nmin values and oat yields (4.0 and 4.6 t per ha) being similar to those in the PLALF system. In the subsequent year, the PLALF system again was more successful in most of the Nmin assessments than the PL and SC systems, which often had rather similar results. In addition, a main crop of field beans was able to compensate for the differences in the Nmin content, and the yields were similar in all three systems (3.1 to 3.7 t per ha). The microbial biomass in the top soil was significantly increased in the reduced tillage system compared to the plough systems. In conclusion, reduced tillage in organic farming can promote soil microorganisms and be competitive if the nitrogen supply is improved through the efficient use of green manure or an adequate leguminous main crop.

Suggested Citation

  • Meike Grosse & Thorsten Haase & Jürgen Heß, 2019. "Tillage System Comparison in Organic Farming: Effects on N Mineralization, Soil Microbial Biomass, and Yield," Organic Farming, Librello publishing house, vol. 5(1), pages 23-36.
  • Handle: RePEc:lib:0000of:v:5:y:2019:i:1:p:23-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.librelloph.com/organicfarming/article/download/420/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.librelloph.com/organicfarming/article/view/420
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lib:0000of:v:5:y:2019:i:1:p:23-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. José A. F. Monteiro (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.