IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Internet Bondholder Relations: Explaining Differences in Transparency Among German Issuers of Corporate Bonds

  • Heinrich Degenhart

    (Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Institut für Bank-, Finanz- und Rechnungswesen, Professur für Finanzierung und Finanzwirtschaft, Scharnhorststraße 1, D-21335 Lüneburg)

  • Steve Janner

    (Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Institut für Bank-, Finanz- und Rechnungswesen, Professur für Finanzierung und Finanzwirtschaft, Scharnhorststraße 1, D-21335 Lüneburg)

Registered author(s):

    Bondholder relations gains importance for German non-financial firms as the debt market environment is changing significantly. Beyond an unprecedented increase in the amount of outstanding securities, there are two other effects that we observe in the German market for corporate bonds: an increasing focus on retail investors and a growing number of small to medium-sized firms entering the market. Both developments underline the need to explore bondholder relations, its implementation and effectiveness. In the course of this study, we intend to promote the understanding of why some firms disclose more to their bondholders than others. Following the information, agency, and related frameworks, we assume that Internet financial reporting helps reduce information asymmetries between bond issuers and dispersed investors. We devote this study to identifying main factors that determine cross-sectional heterogeneity. Conducting a multivariate analysis, we test hypotheses on the influence of capital market orientation, investors’ informational needs, firm complexity, default risk, and family ownership. We find that all constructs, except for the default risk, are at least partly relevant in explaining the extent of information that bond issuers disclose on their websites.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by Credit and Capital Markets in its journal Kredit und Kapital.

    Volume (Year): 45 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 313-341

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:kuk:journl:v:45:y:2012:i:3:p:313-341
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.credit-and-capital-markets.de/

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kuk:journl:v:45:y:2012:i:3:p:313-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Credit and Capital Markets)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.