IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Makroökonomische Stabilisierung und „Beggar-Thy-Neighbour“-Verhalten am Beispiel der Finanzkrise

Listed author(s):
  • Ulrike Bechmann

    (Wissenschaftlicher Stab des Sachverständigenrates zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Richard-Wagner-Straße 21, D-65193 Wiesbaden)

  • Peter Schwarz

    (Jacobs University Bremen, Weizenkampstraße 1, D-28199 Bremen)

Discretionary fiscal policy can – owing to spillover effects – share characteristics of a public good, whenever some countries stabilize output, whereas others free ride and benefit from increasing import demand. Economic theory suggests that especially small countries and countries with large import shares have an incentive to free ride and stabilize less intensively. Prominent US-economists blamed the German government that it pursues a “Beggar-thy-Neighbour” policy during the current financial crisis. We investigate this hypothesis by analyzing the stimulus packages of roughly 50 countries during the financial crisis. Generally, the effects of country size and import shares are small suggesting that there is no need for international coordination of fiscal policy.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by Credit and Capital Markets in its journal Kredit und Kapital.

Volume (Year): 44 (2011)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 161-184

in new window

Handle: RePEc:kuk:journl:v:44:y:2011:i:2:p:161-184
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kuk:journl:v:44:y:2011:i:2:p:161-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Credit and Capital Markets)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.