IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Anwendung des Nachhaltigkeitsansatzes von Bohn zur Etablierung eines Frühindikators in den öffentlichen Finanzen Beitrag zur aktuellen Debatte der Föderalismuskommission II

Listed author(s):
  • Bodo Herzog

    (Professor für Volkswirtschaftslehre, ESB Business School der Hochschule Reutlingen, Alteburgstraße 150, D-72762 Reutlingen)

The question of whether public debt in Europe’s largest economy is sustainable in the long run has received great attention. After all, Germany breached the three percent deficit threshold of the “Stability and Growth Pact” in four successive years, i. e. from 2002 to 2005. In this paper I investigate whether German public finances – Federal and all State governments – have been sustainable during the last four decades. This means finding answers to the following questions: How have German governments reacted to the accumulation of approximately 1.5 billion euro of debt? Have they taken corrective action, or have they let the debt grow? Closer empirical discussion of these questions is also important because of the recent political discussion and new institutional proposals to limit future debt policy by the federal commission (“Föderalismuskommission”). My paper is the first to empirically analyse the sustainability of fiscal policy in Federal Government (“Bund”) and the Federal States (“Länder”). I analyse debt behaviour in Germany on the basis of a unique and newly constructed data sample covering 1970 to 2005. The results are surprising: Fiscal policy is far more sustainable than originally supposed. My paper is the first to apply Bohn’s sustainability criteria to Germany and two Federal States – Baden-Württemberg and Berlin.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by Credit and Capital Markets in its journal Kredit und Kapital.

Volume (Year): 43 (2010)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 183-206

in new window

Handle: RePEc:kuk:journl:v:43:y:2010:i:2:p:183-206
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kuk:journl:v:43:y:2010:i:2:p:183-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Credit and Capital Markets)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.