IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Currency Competition in China Between 1850 and 1950 A Case Study on Hayek’s Denationalised Money?

Listed author(s):
  • David Denzer-Speck

    (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Lehrstuhl für Finanzwissenschaft und Monetäre Ökonomie, Alte Universität Freiburg, Bertoldstraße 17, D-79098 Freiburg/Br)

Registered author(s):

    In this article, we analyse whether China’s monetary system between 1850 and 1950 can be compared to F. A. von Hayek’s idea of denationalised money. While different currencies existed and competed during the whole period, we find that only the first part, until the beginning of the 20th century can be characterised as a one of denationalised money. We furthermore find evidence that the decentralised supply of competing monies acted as a protection against money induced inflation as it helped to preserve the convertibility of banknotes in precious metal. However, this advantage of currency competition came along with considerable transaction and information costs.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by Credit and Capital Markets in its journal Kredit und Kapital.

    Volume (Year): 42 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 327-351

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:kuk:journl:v:42:y:2009:i:3:p:327-351
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kuk:journl:v:42:y:2009:i:3:p:327-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Credit and Capital Markets)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.