IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Too Big to Fail? The Newfoundland Bank Crash of 1894

Listed author(s):
  • Kam Hon Chu

    (Memorial University of Newfoundland, Department of Economics, St. John’s, Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada A1C 5 S7)

Registered author(s):

    In the Newfoundland Bank Crash of 1894, the commercial banks in a duopolistic loan market both went under simultaneously. The banking system was “free”, as central bank, deposit insurance, and lender of last resort were all absent. The objective of this study is to shed light on our understanding of the working of a duopolistic bank loan market and to provide lessons for banking regulation and policies, the too-big-to-fail doctrine in particular. Our regression results suggest a price leader-follower relationship before 1887, and a drastic decline in exports that year triggered a regime change into simultaneous loan expansion that ultimately precipitated a systemic banking failure. The short-lived liquidity crisis, however, was alleviated by entries of Canadian banks. More important, results of intervention analysis suggest that the Crash did not have any significant adverse impact on the fishery sector, the pillar of the single-resource economy.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by Credit and Capital Markets in its journal Kredit und Kapital.

    Volume (Year): 41 (2008)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 161-195

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:kuk:journl:v:41:y:2008:i:2:p:161-195
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kuk:journl:v:41:y:2008:i:2:p:161-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Credit and Capital Markets)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.