Das deutsche Bankensystem Befund – Probleme – Perspektiven (Teil I)
A recurrent element in the debate on the future of the German banking system is the claim that Germany is “overbanked”, as a result of which its banking industry suffers from structurally induced weakness in its profitability. This thesis does not stand up to any thoroughgoing analysis. According to the findings of empirical studies, the productivity of German banks is above average by international standards. The relatively low level of profitability is due not to the banks being too small or to their cost structures being too inefficient, but to the relatively low margins they are able to achieve as a result of the intense competition between them. This is of benefit to consumers, who pay considerably less for banking services than in countries such as Italy or the UK. In view of this (positive) market effect, it is difficult to understand why so many people should be raising their voices to demand changes to the organisational and regulatory framework which would allow a greater consolidation of the German banking market, especially as it has so far not been possible to demonstrate any connection between the size of banking institutions and profitability in the sector. The question needs to be asked – and that not only in view of the most recent crisis on the financial markets – whether the capital market orientated approach is the right one to pursue when determining the regulatory structure of the banking sector. The way the rating agencies, with their less than transparent methodologies, differentiate in their assessments between the various elements of the value chain in banking, the effects of market-orientated accounting practices in terms of high volatility in the reporting of results, and dysfunctional corporate governance all give rise to doubts about the advisability of such an orientation. The recent financial crisis has served only to reinforce these doubts. What consequences in terms of structural and regulatory models for the banking sector can be drawn from the current turbulences on the markets will be discussed in a further article in the next issue of this magazine.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kuk:journl:v:41:y:2008:i:2:p:135-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Credit and Capital Markets)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.