IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jtecht/v50y2025i6d10.1007_s10961-025-10188-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When the marketplace comes to the research laboratory: technology transfer efficiency of innovation-driven publicly funded research centers

Author

Listed:
  • Forough Zarea

    (QUT Business School, The Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship Research)

  • Evan J. Douglas

    (QUT Business School, The Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship Research
    Chulalongkorn University, Sasin School of Management)

  • Martin Obschonka

    (University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Business School)

  • Per Davidsson

    (QUT Business School, The Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship Research
    Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School)

  • David B. Audretsch

    (Indiana University, School of Public and Environmental Affairs)

  • Dietmar W. Hutmacher

    (QUT Business School, The Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship Research
    Queensland University of Technology, Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering
    Queensland University of Technology, ARC Training Centre for Multiscale 3D Imaging, Modelling, and Manufacturing
    Queensland University of Technology, ARC Training Centre for Additive Biomanufacturing, Queensland University of Technology)

Abstract

University technology transfer has garnered significant attention in the fields of innovation and entrepreneurship. Most research has focused on the overall performance of entire universities or their technology transfer offices. This study aims instead to contribute to the literature by evaluating performance and its determinants at the level of individual research centers. By promoting continuous engagement between researchers and external stakeholders these centers facilitate the co-creation of projects with a translational impact. Despite being critical channels for advancing publicly funded technology transfer, research centers have received limited attention in previous studies. To address this gap, we examine the technology transfer efficiency (TTE) of 46 innovation-driven university research centers funded by the Australian Research Council from 2013 to 2021. Combining traditional data envelopment analysis with fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis, we assess these centers’ TTE and identify configurations for high and low TTE outcomes. Our findings reveal respectable performance levels across most research centers; however, significant inefficiencies are related to Master’s and PhD students, and collaborations with external stakeholders. We outline three configurations leading to high TTE, and five configurations for low TTE. Notably, our results highlight the pivotal role of female directors in technology transfer leadership, which significantly contributes to high TTE. Additionally, inefficiencies arise when engaging with multiple external stakeholders and in the utilization of research students and postdoctoral researchers as factors in configurations linked to low TTE. These results highlight the complex causality underlying the technology transfer process and provide implications for research policy and the functioning of research centers.

Suggested Citation

  • Forough Zarea & Evan J. Douglas & Martin Obschonka & Per Davidsson & David B. Audretsch & Dietmar W. Hutmacher, 2025. "When the marketplace comes to the research laboratory: technology transfer efficiency of innovation-driven publicly funded research centers," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2556-2586, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:50:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10961-025-10188-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10961-025-10188-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10961-025-10188-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10961-025-10188-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:50:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10961-025-10188-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.