IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jdm/journl/v6y2011i7p688-696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An illusion of control modulates the reluctance to tempt fate

Author

Listed:
  • Chloe L. Swirsky
  • Philip M. Fernbach
  • Steven A. Sloman

Abstract

The tempting fate effect is that the probability of a fateful outcome is deemed higher following an action that ``tempts'' the outcome than in the absence of such an action. In this paper we evaluate the hypothesis that the effect is due to an illusion of control induced by a causal framing of the situation. Causal frames require that the action make a difference to an outcome and that the action precedes the outcome. If an illusion of control modulates the reluctance to tempt fate, then actions that make a difference to well-being and that occur prior to the outcome should tempt fate most strongly. In Experiments 1--3 we varied whether the action makes a difference and the temporal order of action and outcome. In Experiment 4 we tested whether an action can tempt fate if all outcomes are negative. The results of all four experiments supported our hypothesis that the tempting fate effect depends on a causal construal that gives rise to a false sense of control.

Suggested Citation

  • Chloe L. Swirsky & Philip M. Fernbach & Steven A. Sloman, 2011. "An illusion of control modulates the reluctance to tempt fate," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 6(7), pages 688-696, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:7:p:688-696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journal.sjdm.org/11/11623/jdm11623.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://journal.sjdm.org/11/11623/jdm11623.html
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arad, Ayala, 2014. "Avoiding greedy behavior in situations of uncertainty: The role of magical thinking," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 17-23.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:7:p:688-696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jonathan Baron). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.