New paradoxes in intertemporal choice
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Carlin, Paul S., 1996. "Can the maximization principle be discarded? A comment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 351-353, March.
CitationsCitations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Jonathan W. Leland & Mark Schneider, 2016. "Salience, Framing, and Decisions under Risk, Uncertainty, and Time," Working Papers 16-08, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- repec:jdm:journl:v:12:y:2017:i:3:p:253-259 is not listed on IDEAS
- Lu, Yang & Wu, Dongmei & Zhuang, Xintian, 2016. "Part-whole bias in intertemporal choice: An empirical study of additive assumption," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 463(C), pages 231-235.
- Bethany J. Weber & Wah Pheow Tan, 2012. "Ambiguity aversion in a delay analogue of the Ellsberg Paradox," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, pages 383-389.
- Cheng-Ming Jiang & Feng-Pei Hu & Long-Fei Zhu, 2014. "Introducing upfront losses as well as gains decreases impatience in intertemporal choices with rewards," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, pages 297-302.
- Jih-Jeng Huang & Masahiro Inuiguchi, 2015. "Diminishing Utility Decision Model for Weighting Criteria," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., pages 1263-1284.
More about this item
Keywordsintertemporal choice; risky choice; cancellation.;
StatisticsAccess and download statistics
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jdm:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:2:p:122-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.