The impact of the Taft-Hartley Act on union strength and collective bargaining
Although labor leaders today seldom characterize the Taft-Hartley as the "Slave Labor Act," they remain convinced that the Act was designed primarily to cripple union strength and to impair the workings of free collective bargaining. In this article, the author emphasizes that the experience of the past decade has shown that the Act has had differing effects on the two major aspects of union strength: unions have been somewhat impeded in their efforts to organize the unorganized, but their bargaining power in organized situations has been little affected. Similarly, he shows that, while the bargaining tactics and procedures of the parties have been altered in some respects, the essential power relationships have been little disturbed. (Author's abstract courtesy EBSCO.)
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 11 (1958)
Issue (Month): 3 (April)
|Contact details of provider:|| Fax: 607-255-8016|
Web page: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/ilrreview/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Postal: 381 Ives East, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-3901|
Web: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/ilrreview/ Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ilr:articl:v:11:y:1958:i:3:p:339-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ILR Review)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.