IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Causality Between Government Revenues and Spending in Europe

Listed author(s):
  • Guido Wolswijk

Testing for causality between government revenues and spending reveals useful information on the source of budgetary imbalances. This can form the basis for deciding, whether to base fiscal consolidation on spending cuts or on revenue increases. To this end, this paper conducts Granger-causality tests for several European Union (EU) countries, while also paying attention to long-term mechanisms (error-correction). Diverse outcomes for the 12 countries in the sample are found, with mutual causality (synchronization) in place for Austria, Finland, Great Britain, Greece and Portugal, and the evidence of ‘tax-and-spend’ behavior for Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands and Sweden. No evidence of any causality was found for Belgium, Denmark and Italy. Generally, these results are confirmed by an effectiveness analysis, especially when focussing on short-term causality results. Revenue increases appear to be more effective in consolidation of public finances in Austria, Finland, Great Britain, Portugal and Sweden, while for other countries less clear indications can be derived. The diversity of causality results point at national fiscal institutions having to play a key role in reducing budgetary imbalances.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by IUP Publications in its journal The IUP Journal of Public Finance.

Volume (Year): VII (2009)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
Pages: 6-24

in new window

Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjpf:v:07:y:2009:i:2:p:6-24
Contact details of provider:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjpf:v:07:y:2009:i:2:p:6-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (G R K Murty)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.