IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjar/v13y2014i3p56-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the Benford Datasets and the Reddy and Sebastin Results to Form an Audit Alert Screening Heuristic: An Appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Edward J Lusk
  • Michael Halperin

Abstract

Digital Frequency Testing (DFT) is a simple and potentially effective tool that can be used efficiently in the certification audit as well as in the service of forensic investigations to rationalize the use of extended audit procedures at the substantive phase of the audit. To further the hegemony of DFT, this paper summarizes certain aspects of the excellent treatment of DFT offered by Reddy and Sebastin (2012). In the following, the paper takes up the development of a Benford Screening Window (BSW) that can be employed to create alerts as to when datasets under audit examination do not seem to conform to the DFT profile as corrected from the Benford (1938) paper. The BSW is tested vis-à-vis the log10expectation function, two accounting industry datasets downloaded from COMPUSTATTM, and the 12 years of in-kind committee contributions dataset developed by Reddy and Sebastin (2012). The paper finds a reasonable fit for these datasets for the BSW and hence suggests an overall calibration cut-off taken from the results obtained by passing the Reddy-Sebastin datasets through the BSW. In this paper, the authors have programmed an ExcelTMVBAâ driven Decision Support System (DSS) to aid in the creation of these audit alerts which is available for free as a download with no restriction on its use.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward J Lusk & Michael Halperin, 2014. "Using the Benford Datasets and the Reddy and Sebastin Results to Form an Audit Alert Screening Heuristic: An Appraisal," The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices, IUP Publications, vol. 0(3), pages 56-69, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjar:v:13:y:2014:i:3:p:56-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edward J. Lusk & Michael Halperin, 2014. "Detecting Newcomb-Benford Digital Frequency Anomalies in the Audit Context: Suggested Chi2 Test Possibilities," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(2), pages 191-191, May.
    2. Yan Bao & Frank Heilig & Chuo-Hsuan Lee & Edward Lusk, 2018. "Full Range Testing of the Small Size Effect Bias for Benford Screening: A Note," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(6), pages 47-52, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjar:v:13:y:2014:i:3:p:56-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.