Sind atypische Beschäftigungsverhältnisse prekär? : eine empirische Analyse sozialer Risiken (Are atypical employment relationships precarious? : an empirical analysis of social risks)
"The paper examines the extent to which atypical forms of employment are exposed to greater social risks than standard employment relationships. The empirical analysis, based on data from the Socio-Economic Panel, compares temporary work, fixed-term and 'marginal' part-time work as well as regular part-time work with permanent fulltime employment relationships. The criteria for social risks comprise wages, participation in company training schemes and employment stability. The panel regressions confirm the assumption that people who are atypically employed are exposed to greater social risks than those comparably employed in standard employment forms. The most significant disadvantages are to be seen in wage levels in all forms of atypical employment. A greater stability risk is found amongst fixed-term employees and temporary workers. Furthermore, the results indicate that access to company further training is not independent of the duration of the employment. Part-time workers and those who are marginally employed have lower chances of taking part in further training than workers with standard employment contracts. The results obtained do not mean, however, that according to the characteristics analysed here the majority of atypical employment relationships can be described as precarious." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en)) Additional Information Kurzfassung (deutsch) Executive summary (English)
Volume (Year): 41 (2008)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.iab.de/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.springer.com/economics/labor/journal/12651?detailsPage=subscription|
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Michael Kvasnicka & Axel Werwatz, 2002. "Lohneffekte der Zeitarbeit," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 69(49), pages 847-854.
- Burda, Michael C. & Kvasnicka, Michael, 2004.
"Zeitarbeit in Deutschland: Trends und Perspektiven,"
2004,36, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Center for Applied Statistics and Economics (CASE).
- Michael C. Burda & Michael Kvasnicka, 2006. "Zeitarbeit in Deutschland: Trends und Perspektiven," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 7(2), pages 195-225, 05.
- Michael C. Burda & Michael Kvasnicka, 2005. "Zeitarbeit in Deutschland: Trends und Perspektiven," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2005-048, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
- Michael C. Burda & Michael Kvasnicka, 2005. "Zeitarbeit in Deutschland: Trends und Perspektiven," Labor and Demography 0510004, EconWPA.
- E. Paul Durrenberger, 2005. "Labour," Chapters, in: A Handbook of Economic Anthropology, chapter 8 Edward Elgar.
- Michael Kvasnicka, 2008.
"Does Temporary Help Work Provide a Stepping Stone to Regular Employment?,"
NBER Working Papers
13843, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Michael Kvasnicka, 2009. "Does Temporary Help Work Provide a Stepping Stone to Regular Employment?," NBER Chapters, in: Studies of Labor Market Intermediation, pages 335-372 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Heckman, James J, 1979.
"Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error,"
Econometric Society, vol. 47(1), pages 153-61, January.
- Zeenobiyah Hannif & Felicity Lamm, 2005. "When Non-Standard Work Becomes Precarious: Insights from the New Zealand Call Centre Industry," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 16(3), pages 324-350.
- Karl Brenke & Werner Eichhorst, 2008. "Leiharbeit breitet sich rasant aus," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 75(19), pages 242-252.
- Renate Neubaeumer & Dominik Tretter, 2008. "Mehr atypische Beschaeftigung aus theoretischer Sicht," Industrielle Beziehungen - Zeitschrift fuer Arbeit, Organisation und Management - The German Journal of Industrial Relations, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 15(3), pages 256 - 278.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabzaf:v:2008:i:4:p:501-531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (IAB, Geschäftsbereich Dokumentation und Bibliothek)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.