IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i5p2211-d1871147.html

Driving Public Support for Urban Waste-Sorting Policies: A Configuration Analysis of Policy Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Beijia Zhang

    (School of Management, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

Abstract

The Chinese government has become increasingly concerned about waste sorting and has implemented several supportive policies to promote sustainable development. Public support is critical to successful policy implementation. Hence, this study focused on increasing public support for waste-sorting policies. The complicated mechanisms underlying policy factors’ effects on public support for waste-sorting policies were investigated from a configuration perspective by employing a combination of random forest, necessary condition analysis, and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis methodologies. The results indicated that five policy factors, namely, perceived policy effectiveness, policy participation, policy fairness, policy preference, and government trust, have a strong predictive impact on public support outcomes. However, none could stand alone as necessary conditions for public support and their synergistic effects must be exploited. Five configurations were demonstrated as promoting public support for waste-sorting policies, in which the perceived policy effectiveness and policy preference were the core conditions for four of these configurations, playing a universal role in fostering public support. Overall, governments should be flexible in choosing acceptable paths to enhance public support based on local realities, with a focus on enhancing perceived policy effectiveness and policy preference.

Suggested Citation

  • Beijia Zhang, 2026. "Driving Public Support for Urban Waste-Sorting Policies: A Configuration Analysis of Policy Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2211-:d:1871147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2211/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2211/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2211-:d:1871147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.