IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i11p5482-d1955534.html

University Research for the Improvement of SDGs: A Framework for Mapping and Assessing SDG Science at the Country Level

Author

Listed:
  • Sérgio Evangelista Silva

    (Production Engineering Department, Federal University of Ouro Preto, João Monlevade 35930-090, MG, Brazil)

  • Savio Figueira Corrêa

    (Institute of Exact and Applied Sciences, Federal University of Ouro Preto, João Monlevade 35930-090, MG, Brazil)

  • Cecília Silva Monnerat

    (Pos-Graduating in Production Engineering, Federal University of Ouro Preto, João Monlevade 35930-090, MG, Brazil)

  • Rafael Lucas Machado Pinto

    (Production Engineering Department, Federal University of Ouro Preto, João Monlevade 35930-090, MG, Brazil)

Abstract

Humankind is facing the enormous challenge of ensuring a sustainable future for new generations. A key guide to addressing this challenge is the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which aim to promote economic and social development and environmental preservation. Despite the good intentions embedded in the SDGs, current performance worldwide remains below expectations. To be effective, the progress on the SDGs depends on the creation of new scientific knowledge. In this context, universities and research institutes should play a fundamental role in generating new scientific knowledge. Although recent models have been developed to assess universities’ knowledge creation to advance the SDGs, it remains necessary to develop new models that can more effectively evaluate and detail this capability. The goal of this article is to introduce a three-level framework for identifying SDG science at the country level across universities and research institutes. This model is validated through a documentary study based on SciVal-Elsevier data, on Brazilian universities, and a research institute in the context of SDG 2 research—zero hunger—between 2015 and 2024. As the main results, the framework provides three levels of knowledge mapping based on subject areas, knowledge categories, and cluster names, whereas the first and the last are used in the Scopus database, and the third is proposed in this study. As a result, this framework consists of a practical instrument for the mapping of the effective issues addressed in each SDG, and for comparing the effective content of SDG science between research institutions. As the main contribution, this article introduces a practical instrument for the assessment of the contribution of universities and research institutes in SDG science. Theoretically, this framework provides a practical process for rapidly identifying the current SDG science performance in research institutions at the country level. For practical purposes, this study can be used by universities, research institutes, and policymakers to understand the current state of SDG science in a country or region and to develop new research programmes and strategies for SDG science and innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sérgio Evangelista Silva & Savio Figueira Corrêa & Cecília Silva Monnerat & Rafael Lucas Machado Pinto, 2026. "University Research for the Improvement of SDGs: A Framework for Mapping and Assessing SDG Science at the Country Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5482-:d:1955534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5482/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5482/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5482-:d:1955534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.