IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial1p989-1009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust in the Diffusion of Professional Knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl
  • Małgorzata Cwiek

Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of the study is to indicate the role of trust in the processes of knowledge diffusion of IT professionals. This includes the identification of individual types and components of trust impacting the knowledge exchange between intellectual workers, as seen from the perspective of knowledge agent groups involved in its circulation, and in sub-processes constituting the transfer of knowledge, as well as in generation of specialists. Design/Methodology/Approach: The procedure for obtaining empirical data consisted of three stages: the direct semi-structured individual interview, focus group online interviews (FIGO), computer assisted telephone interview (CATI) and computer-assisted web interview (CAWI). The hypotheses were tested with a test of significance for Spearman’s rank-order correlation coefficient and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Findings: Trust is a factor in knowledge diffusion among intellectual workers and its importance depends on the groups of knowledge agents participating in it. Trust is most important in the exchange of knowledge among professionals, then in the circulation of knowledge between specialists and co-operators, and the least important – in the dispersion of knowledge between knowledge workers and the organization's personnel. Regardless of the group participating in the circulation of knowledge, the foundation of trust is competence-based trust, supported by benevolence-based trust. Practical Implications: The presented considerations provide specific indications as to which components of trust to develop due to the sub process of knowledge diffusion, and knowledge agents involved in the circulation. Originality/Value: This study's main contribution is filling the existing research gap regarding the impact of trust on the flow of intellectual workers’ knowledge. The work has theoretical and practical contribution to research on the diffusion of professional knowledge. It organizes the theory and formulates practical guidelines for the formation of trust as a factor of knowledge dispersion.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Cwiek, 2021. "Trust in the Diffusion of Professional Knowledge," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 989-1009.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special1:p:989-1009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2084/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharmila Jayasingam & Muhiniswari Govindasamy & Sharan Kaur Garib Singh, 2016. "Instilling affective commitment: insights on what makes knowledge workers want to stay," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(3), pages 266-288, March.
    2. Brown, Sarah & Gray, Daniel & McHardy, Jolian & Taylor, Karl, 2015. "Employee trust and workplace performance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 361-378.
    3. Sri Widyastuti & Muhammad Said & Safitri Siswono & Dian Andi Firmansyah, 2019. "Customer Trust through Green Corporate Image, Green Marketing Staretgy and Social Responsibility: A Case Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 343-359.
    4. Sri Widyastuti & Muhammad Said & Safitri Siswono & Dian Andi Firmansyah, 2019. "Customer Trust through Green Corporate Image, Green Marketing Strategy, and Social Responsibility: A Case Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 83-99.
    5. John A. Cotsomitis, 2018. "Is the learning economy a viable concept for understanding the modern economy?," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 45(3), pages 492-507, March.
    6. Hegadekatti, Kartik & S G, Yatish, 2017. "The Programmable Economy: Envisaging an Entire Planned Economic System as a Single Computer through Blockchain Networks," MPRA Paper 82831, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 16 May 2017.
    7. Amitabh Anand & Isabelle Walsh & Sandra Moffett, 2019. "Does humility facilitate knowledge sharing? Investigating the role of humble knowledge inquiry and response," Post-Print halshs-02284002, HAL.
    8. Elena Ustyuzhanina & Sergey Evsukov & Irina Komarova, 2018. "Network Economy as a New Economic System," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 77-89.
    9. Muhammad Khalique & Jamal Abdul Nassir bin Shaari & Abu Hassan bin Md. Isa, 2013. "The road to the development of intellectual capital theory," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 122-136.
    10. Dagmara Lewicka & Agnieszka Zakrzewska-Bielawska, 2020. "Interorganizational Trust in Business Relations: Cooperation and Coopetition," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Agnieszka Zakrzewska-Bielawska & Iwona Staniec (ed.), Contemporary Challenges in Cooperation and Coopetition in the Age of Industry 4.0, chapter 0, pages 155-174, Springer.
    11. Fawcett, Stanley E. & Jones, Stephen L. & Fawcett, Amydee M., 2012. "Supply chain trust: The catalyst for collaborative innovation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 163-178.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek, 2021. "Social Facilitators of Specialist Knowledge Dispersion in the Digital Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Leszek Dziawgo, 2021. "Energy Sectors on Capital Market – Financing the Process “Towards Sustainability”," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 938-955.
    3. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek & Bernard Ziębicki & Anna Wójcik-Karpacz, 2021. "Organizational Culture as a Prerequisite for Knowledge Transfer among IT Professionals: The Case of Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-32, December.
    4. Gain Park & Hyun Soon Park, 2020. "Communicating Sustainability to Ethnocentric Consumers in China: Focusing on Social Distance from Foreign Corporations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. S. M. Shafiul Alam & K. M. Zahidul Islam, 2021. "Examining the role of environmental corporate social responsibility in building green corporate image and green competitive advantage," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Arian Matin & Tornike Khoshtaria & Metin Marcan & Davit Datuashvili, 2022. "The roles of hedonistic, utilitarian incentives and government policies affecting customer attitudes and purchase intention towards green products," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(4), pages 709-735, December.
    7. Khachatryan, Hayk & Rihn, Alicia & Wei, Xuan, 2021. "Consumers’ Preferences for Eco-labels on Plants: The Influence of Trust and Consequentiality Perceptions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Joanna Wyrwisz & Jacek Dziwulski, 2021. "Sustainability as a Brand Power Factor in the Women's and Men's Assessment," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 357-367.
    9. Joseph Elmer G. Noval, 2023. "Green Marketing Practices and Corporate Social Responsibility as Predictors of Organizatonal Commitment among the Selected Food Manufacturing Companies in Davao City," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(9), pages 914-929, September.
    10. Wioleta Kucharska, 2017. "Relationships between Trust and Collaborative Culture in The Context of Tacit Knowledge Sharing," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 14(4), pages 61-78.
    11. You-Kyung Lee, 2020. "The Relationship between Green Country Image, Green Trust, and Purchase Intention of Korean Products: Focusing on Vietnamese Gen Z Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Pak Hung Au & Yuk‐Fai Fong & Jin Li, 2020. "Negotiated Block Trade And Rebuilding Of Trust," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 61(2), pages 901-939, May.
    13. Helga Guðrún Óskarsdóttir & Guðmundur Valur Oddsson, 2017. "A Soft Systems Approach to Knowledge Worker Productivity—Analysis of the Problem Situation," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, August.
    14. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Liao, Shu-Hsien & Hu, Da-Chian & Ding, Li-Wen, 2017. "Assessing the influence of supply chain collaboration value innovation, supply chain capability and competitive advantage in Taiwan's networking communication industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 143-153.
    16. Tamilina, Larysa & Tamilina, Natalya, 2019. "Social Trust Formation in the Workplace: Applying the Job Strain Model to Explain Variations in Social Trust Levels among Employed Individuals," MPRA Paper 93559, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Judit Oláh & Yusmar Ardhi Hidayat & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz & Morshadul Hasan & József Popp, 2021. "Inter-Organizational Trust on Financial Performance: Proposing Innovation as a Mediating Variable to Sustain in a Disruptive Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Elzbieta Szaruga & Elzbieta Zaloga, 2021. "Global Network Economy Society: Information Needs on the Ethical Framework and Trust in Transportation and Logistics Business among Users of the Google Search Engine," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 835-849.
    19. Adam Seth Litwin & Sherry M. Tanious, 2021. "Information Technology, Business Strategy and the Reassignment of Work from In‐House Employees to Agency Temps," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(3), pages 816-847, September.
    20. Nagamani Subramanian & M. Suresh, 2022. "Social Sustainability Factors Influencing the Implementation of Sustainable HRM in Manufacturing SMEs," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 469-507, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Knowledge diffusion; knowledge worker; IT sector.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • D64 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Altruism; Philanthropy; Intergenerational Transfers
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special1:p:989-1009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.