S&P 500 index inclusion announcements: does the S&P committee tell us something new?
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to directly examine the information hypothesis of S&P 500 index inclusion announcements by investigating the degree to which information beyond Standard & Poor's eight stated criteria enters the inclusion decision. Design/methodology/approach - Isolating a sample of S&P 500 additions and their eligible candidates during 1987-2004, this paper employs logistic analysis that identifies factors Findings - The evidence indicates that, when choosing among new S&P 500 candidates, the S&P's committee relies primarily on publicly available information related to enterprise risk and historical performance. Material, private insight into future value-relevant information plays at most a small part in the selection. Research limitations/implications - The results suggest that index additions convey limited new information about added firms. Studies analysing index additions should start with the presumption that index inclusion announcements are information-free events, and focus on the consequences of index inclusions such as liquidity, awareness or arbitrage risk, in their relation to index premia. Originality/value - The results indicate that the previous evidence supporting the information hypothesis using the S&P 500 inclusions is not compelling.
Volume (Year): 36 (2010)
Issue (Month): 5 (April)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.emeraldinsight.com|
|Order Information:|| Postal: Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK|
Web: http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=mf Email:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1992. " The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 427-465, June.
- William Elliott & Bonnie Van Ness & Mark Walker & Richard Warr, 2006. "What Drives the S&P 500 Inclusion Effect? An Analytical Source," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 35(4), Winter.
- Bowman, Robert G, 1979. "The Theoretical Relationship between Systematic Risk and Financial (Accounting) Variables," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 34(3), pages 617-630, June.
- Ernest N. Biktimirov & Arnold R. Cowan & Bradford D. Jordan, 2004. "Do Demand Curves for Small Stocks Slope Down?," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 161-178.
- repec:bla:joares:v:6:y:1968:i:2:p:159-178 is not listed on IDEAS
- William B. Elliott & Bonnie F. Ness & Mark D. Walker & Richard S. Wan, 2006. "What Drives the S&P 500 Inclusion Effect? An Analytical Survey," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 35(4), pages 31-48, December.
- French, Kenneth R. & Schwert, G. William & Stambaugh, Robert F., 1987. "Expected stock returns and volatility," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 3-29, September.
- Diane K. Denis & John J. McConnell & Alexei V. Ovtchinnikov & Yun Yu, 2003. "S&P 500 Index Additions and Earnings Expectations," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(5), pages 1821-1840, October.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mfipps:v:36:y:2010:i:5:p:368-393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Virginia Chapman)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.