Faith-based and sin portfolios: An empirical inquiry into norm-neglect vs norm-conforming investor behavior
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate relative portfolio performance between sin stock returns and faith-based returns. Design/methodology/approach - Similar to Hong and Kacperczyk, Jensen's alpha was utilized to conduct tests along with three asset-pricing models and rolling regression technique to reveal that faith-based and sin betas move in opposite directions during most of the sample period. Findings - Norm-neglect was found, in that Jensen's alpha is positive and significant for the sin portfolio. Further, evidence in favor of norm-conforming investor behavior was found, where Jensen's alpha is negative and significant for the faith-based portfolio. These findings provide evidence that the sin portfolio outperforms the faith-based portfolio relative to the market. A rolling regression technique reveals that faith-based and sin betas tend to move in opposite directions during most of the sample period. The evidence suggests that faith-based beta has an average estimated beta of one, mimicking the market. The sin portfolio, however, has an average estimated beta of one-half. Finally, the reward-to-risk measure, Sharpe ratio, is statistically higher for the sin portfolio relative to the faith-based portfolio. Originality/value - This paper contributes to the literature in the following distinct ways. First, three asset-pricing models are estimated to examine Jensen's alpha for sin and faith-based portfolios. Second, a rolling regression procedure is used to examine the dynamic behavior relative to the market of the sin and faith-based portfolios. Third, use is made of the Jobson and Korkie test, which allows for statistical comparisons of Sharpe ratios. Lastly, daily instead of monthly data and a different sample period are used to examine the research questions posed in this study.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 36 (2010)
Issue (Month): 10 (August)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.emeraldinsight.com|
|Order Information:|| Postal: Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK|
Web: http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=mf Email:
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1993. "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-56, February.
- Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1997. "Industry costs of equity," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 153-193, February.
- Carhart, Mark M, 1997. " On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 57-82, March.
- Banz, Rolf W., 1981. "The relationship between return and market value of common stocks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 3-18, March.
- Emil Boasson & Vigdis Boasson & Joseph Cheng, 2006. "Investment principles and strategies of faith-based funds," Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 32(10), pages 837-845.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mfipps:v:36:y:2010:i:10:p:876-885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Virginia Chapman)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.