Numeric-to-verbal translation of probability expressions in SFAS 5
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate how accountants interpret verbal uncertainty expressions with a focus on numeric-to-verbal translation. Design/methodology/approach – Accounting for loss contingencies (SFAS 5) were chosen as a setting to study this research question. The approach used was a behavioral experiment where participants choose probability phrases for 11 numeric probabilities for two default conditions. Findings – The results indicate a clear pattern, where thresholds for accrual and disclosure decisions can be easily identified in the numeric-to-verbal translation. Also, the base rate appears to affect the assessment of the uncertainty related to potential default, but does not affect mapping of numeric values to verbal terms. Research limitations/implications – The use of 11 probabilities does not cover all regions of the [0, 1] probability line and may leave regions of the probability interval not mapping to any SFAS 5 phrase. Also, this study uses upper-level undergraduate accounting students, whose judgments are similar to novice auditors but may differ from experienced auditors. Practical implications – The evidence suggests that unlike verbal-to-numeric translation, which is unstable and context dependent, numeric-to-verbal translation is quite consistent among individuals, and is unlikely to be affected by the contextual information. The results complement prior findings in auditors' judgment, and suggest that interpreting uncertainty expressions can be improved if auditors are encouraged to use numeric-to-verbal translation when they apply accounting and auditing standards in forming an opinion on the financial report. Originality/value – This is the first paper to examine the mapping of numeric probabilities to verbal probability terms.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 26 (2011)
Issue (Month): 3 (March)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.emeraldinsight.com|
|Order Information:|| Postal: Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK|
Web: http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=maj Email:
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Hoffman, Vicky B. & Patton, James M., 2002. "How are loss contingency accruals affected by alternative reporting criteria and incentives?," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 151-167.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:v:26:y:2011:i:3:p:248-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Louise Lister)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.